While i can't say what the dual woofer reasoning is/was, i can tell you that in the case of 9844's the dual woofer setup has a very equivalent polar response to the 811 horn at the XO point, with good XO's it's a seamless match to my ears.Quote:
I think most Altec speakers using the 12" (414) use 2 with a small format HF driver.Just for that reason that they don't produce enough bass.Is this wrong ??? I just don't see the advantage of doing that with a 12" my thought would be to just use a real 604.I dunno
IMO, the advantage of a 12 inch duplex is mostly in it's compact size. Used as the sole driver in a full range system, you could be looking at a pretty small(under 2 cuft?) package.
I would also think that the smaller/lower mass cone would improve transient response, not sure if the difference would be audible, but certainly attractive to the number crunchers.
Of course i think most of us Altec fans/tinkerers/hobbyists picture a 12 inch duplex as the upper 2/3 of a 3-way system. My thinking is that you could have a very substantial "extended" range system in a package about the size of a 620 cabinet using the 411 woofer in the bottom.
Many years ago, Peavey made a single box system(project four) that used a 12 inch BW duplex, and a 15 inch BW to fill out the bottom. At that time, it was one of the most substantial drum monitor/side fill boxes i'd heard. Not exactly hifi, but the SPL and coherence were amazing for any loudspeaker, let alone one wearing a "Peavey" badge. I'd love to hear a refined version of that design approach using Altec components.
Just my .02.......................................